Workplace Investigations 101: How to Conduct your Investigation Like a Pro

Dr. Susan Strauss

Date:
Feb. 19, 2025
Duration:
2 Hours
Time:
1 PM EST | 10 AM PST | Wednesday
Speaker:
Dr. Susan Strauss

Live Version:

Recorded Version:

Combo Offers

Live + Recorded

Live + Recorded

HRtrainup is recognized by SHRM to offer Professional Development Credits (PDCs) for the SHRM-CPSM or SHRM-SCPSM. This program is valid for [1.50] PDCs for the SHRM-CPSM or SHRM-SCPSM. For more information about certification or recertification, please visit www.shrmcertification.org.

Overview:

When we think of workplace investigations, the most common thought is that of investigating harassment complaints. However, there are so many other forms of workplace misconduct that require investigations such as: theft, safety or OSHA issues, retaliation, vandalism, working off the clock, substance abuse, social media violations, and violations of various company policies, as examples. Usually this responsibility is left to HR, sometimes to management, and there may be a need to determine if an outside investigator, such as law enforcement or an IT professional, is the best person to investigate.

Conducting an investigation is both a science and an art. There is the scientific/technical aspect ensuring the I’s are doted and the T’s are crossed to minimize liability. And there is the ‘art’ of investigating in establishing rapport with those you interview, creating a safe environment in which to interview, and recognizing that interviewees are usually stressed during the interview process. As an employer you have a duty to investigate. Employees have an obligation to cooperate with the investigative process—but what if you have a recalcitrant complainant, wrong-doer or witness? Documentation and writing a final report are critical aspects of an investigation process which begins as soon as an employee makes a complaint—do you know how to document? Do you know the critical elements of a final report to minimize liability? One of the first questions you, as an HR professional, need to consider is whether the complaint requires a full-blown formal investigation or if a less formal resolution is appropriate because the complaint is a minor policy violation. What do you do if you need to search the employee’s desk, computer, smart phone or locker? Other questions that need to be answered are when do you include legal counsel? What evidence do you need to gather? This webinar will focus on these issues by discussing best practices to ensure you are conducting a fair and impartial investigation that will support a positive work environment, protect employees and the organization, and decrease the risk of liability.

Anyone who conducts an investigation must be trained in how to do so. Merely having the experience of conducting investigations without having been taught the art and science of the process is not enough. When your organization ensures it is investigator is trained in how to conduct investigations, it demonstrates its commitment to prevention of harassment to the Court or outside agency.


Why you should Attend:

This webinar addresses laws that HR is responsible for upholding. When the laws are not followed, it increases the liability for the organization and interferes with a fair and equitable work environment for employees.

Objectives:

1. To identify what constitutes a complaint
2. To determine if an investigation is necessary
3. To discuss the steps of an investigation
4. To explore the intricacies of interviewing the accuser, accused and witnesses
5. To demonstrate good documentation
6. To differentiate between a formal and informal investigative procedures


Agenda:

• Discussion about if and when an investigation is required
• Comparison of a formal and informal investigation process
• Planning for the investigation
• Review of what constitutes a witness
• Legal issues surrounding an investigation such as confidentiality, defamation of character, and false imprisonment
• The importance of documentation of each interviewee
• Examples of appropriate and inappropriate documentation and why it is critical
• Specific details regarding how to corroborate evidence
• List of criteria to determine credibility of those interviewed
• The role of the investigator in forming an opinion following the investigation
• How to follow-up with the target, accused, and the organization
• The critical importance of an investigative report
• List of misconduct triggers that are a catalyst for an investigation
• Template final report

Who Will Benefit:

Human Resources professionals
Managers

Live Version:

Recorded Version:

Combo Offers

Live + Recorded

Live + Recorded

HRtrainup is recognized by SHRM to offer Professional Development Credits (PDCs) for the SHRM-CPSM or SHRM-SCPSM. This program is valid for [1.50] PDCs for the SHRM-CPSM or SHRM-SCPSM. For more information about certification or recertification, please visit www.shrmcertification.org.


Instructor:

Dr. Susan Strauss

A National and International Speaker, Trainer and Consultant

Susan Strauss RN Ed.D. is a national and international speaker, trainer and consultant. Her specialty areas harassment, discrimination and bullying; organization development, and management/leadership development. Her clients are from healthcare, education, business, law, and government organizations from both the public and private sector. Susan conducts bullying and harassment investigations, works as an expert witness for harassment and bullying lawsuits, and coaches those managers and employees that need assistance in stopping their harassing or bullying behaviour. Dr. Strauss has authored over 30 books, book chapters, and articles, as well as written curriculum and training manuals. Susan has been featured on 20/20, CBS Evening News, and other television and radio programs as well as interviewed for newspaper and journal articles such as the Times of London, Lawyers Weekly, and Harvard Education Newsletter. Susan has presented at international conferences in Botswana, Egypt, Thailand, Israel, Palestine, Bali, Lebanon, and the U.S., and conducted sex discrimination research in Poland. She has consulted with professionals from other countries such as Israel, England, Australia, Canada and St. Martin. She has her masters in community health and holds a doctorate in organizational leadership.